Log in

No account? Create an account
Jul 26th
03:42 am
'At Any Price' confirmed for Venice  

Variety and the official website confirm that At Any Price will play at the Venice Film Festival in competition. The Biennale runs from 29th of August to 8th of September. The screening schedule will be available on 15 August 2012.
36 36 comments Comment
annabelle83 on July 26th, 2012 11:38 am (UTC)
I guess the billing doesn't matter as long as Zac gets a lot of positive buzz from it. But I think if this movie is considered "Zac's movie" than Quaid's it'll help Zac a lot, like Cosmopolis helped Rob Pattinson. Cosmopolis didn't necessarily get great reviews, but Rob, its main star, got a lot of hype from it which helped him earn respect among movie fanatics.
Bee: Zac – CStC photocall - tree bgjeezbee on July 26th, 2012 11:52 am (UTC)
Based on what I know, At Any Price has 2 leads, Dennis and Zac, with Dennis' role being slightly bigger. In that respect it's different than Cosmopolis which clearly had a single dominating lead in Robert Pattinson and the rest were supporting players.

I'm totally good though with the fact that Zac is not the single lead, I actually prefer that since he's not a draw to the target audience of that movie. He's still a lead though, so if he gives a good performance I'm convinced he will get a lot of credit. It could be recognized as "Zac movie" if his performance stands out, otherwise it will be a Bahrani movie imo.

As for the listed "billing" - to my knowledge Maika's role is bigger and more important than both, Heather Graham's and Kim Dickens' but she's not even mentioned anywhere since she's a noname right now which shows me that they just listed them in terms of name recognition.
annabelle83 on July 26th, 2012 12:26 pm (UTC)
I pray At Any Price and Zac's performance in it get amazing reviews and Zac gets cast in lots of great movies after that. Even if that doesn't happen, I hope the movie at least changes people's perception about Zac. To be honest, I'm envious that Rob started to get respect as an actor from movie fanatics thanks to Cosmopolis.

I've read an article titled "100 most valuable movie stars in Hollywood" recently and according to them, Zac's likeability among general public is only 38(out of 100). That's the same score as Tom Cruise! I can't believe Zac is hated as much as Tom. Then I noticed Rob got only 31. It seems everyone hates these teen idols except their fanbase. No wonder studios are hesitant to cast them in big movies. So, I think the first thing Zac has to do is get credibility as an actor. I'm okay with him doing independent movies as long as he keeps getting quality roles. But it's sad that I won't be able to see his movies at the movies because independent movies hardly get theatrical release in my country.(unless they get Oscar nomination)
Beejeezbee on July 26th, 2012 12:39 pm (UTC)
Yeah, Zac's likeability number puts him on #98 out of 100 - 3rd to last even below Sean Penn and others. Only Sasha Baron Cohen (I'm surprised about that one) and Rob (who is last) are below him.

Which just reenforces what many of us have been saying for a long time, he needs to stop doing those entirely female skewing movies because it makes everyone outside of that narrow target demo of sappy romances (esp the guys) hate him even more than they already do. The longer he stays in that realm, the harder it will be to get out of it.

The other problem is that Zac's box office numbers haven't been that great in the last few years with his bigger successes being now back several years.

As I said recently, I liked the last few choices even if they didn't all totally work out but imo he really needs to stay away from romantic dramas/rom-coms and other hated (female and teen skewing) genres/movies for longer. There were some rumors flying around a bit ago but those were rom-coms and I hope he won't go for them unless they have a really great director and script which would make up for it (none of them had that though).

Edited at 2012-07-26 12:59 pm (UTC)
kleth on July 26th, 2012 04:50 pm (UTC)
Clearly, great minds think alike.

I particularly endorse the point about box office. Apparently, 17 Again was a false dawn. Since then, his solo movies have been weak at the box office.

Last year was an annus mirabilis with important roles in two indies from hot directors, leading to this year's street-cred earning appearances at Cannes, Venice, and Toronto. He may yet become perceived as an actor rather than an idol.
Beejeezbee on July 26th, 2012 04:57 pm (UTC)
Well, he only made 2 studio movies since then and TLO did ok at the box office, not great but it was solid in the US and he opened it well. But that one movie is just not enough over a 3 year period since CStC disappointed. At least not enough to overcome his downsides when it comes to casting him in studio projects which aren't his bread-and-butter demo.

Edited at 2012-07-26 05:02 pm (UTC)
kleth on July 27th, 2012 06:12 pm (UTC)
I rank TLO right down their with CStC for box office. On opening weekend, CStC pulled something like $12.4 million. TLO opened bigger, but the exit poll said 56 percent of the audience came to see Zac. 56 percent of the box office was $12.5 million.

That seems to be the figure Zac can tattoo on his forehead for his solo movies (and that's for studio movies in wide release).

This guy really needs a hit.
Beejeezbee on July 30th, 2012 06:13 pm (UTC)
Sorry for the late reply.

This logic doesn't really make any sense to me?

It's not like 100% of the CStC audience came for Zac. While I don't have any numbers to compare, I would expect that the 56% for TLO are really high because otherwise the studio wouldn't have released this number. The CStC percentage is probably similar or potentially even smaller.
(no subject) - kleth on July 31st, 2012 02:52 pm (UTC) (Expand)
kleth on July 26th, 2012 04:34 pm (UTC)
"It seems everyone hates these teen idols except their fanbase. No wonder studios are hesitant to cast them in big movies. So, I think the first thing Zac has to do is get credibility as an actor."

It's his only way out of the hole he's standing in. It's hard for those who are entranced by Zac Efron to comprehend just what a handicap his early status as a teen idol and "Disney star" is. As hard as it is to accept, lots of potential movie goers don't like him because he is "that guy."
kleth on July 26th, 2012 04:55 pm (UTC)
I should have said "because they #think# he is that guy." Having made up their minds who Zac Efron is, they don't give his bio or his subsequent work a fair look. It's prejudice, not judgement.
Miranda gives everyone a chancemirandagirll on July 26th, 2012 04:43 pm (UTC)
Zac and DeNiro have the same studio score which I found interesting,
Beejeezbee on July 26th, 2012 04:50 pm (UTC)
That's because DeNiro is too old to be a traditional leading man. If he were younger, it would be very different.

Edited at 2012-07-26 04:51 pm (UTC)
Miranda gives everyone a chancemirandagirll on July 26th, 2012 04:53 pm (UTC)
Ah, ok.

Idk theres something off about that list. Like Lautner is ranked way higher than Pattinon, and I figured he'd be the highest ranking twilight person on the list, but no.
Beejeezbee on July 26th, 2012 04:59 pm (UTC)
That's because Taylor's likeability quotient is higher and he hasn't made any indies which lower his BO average like Rob. That's why.
Miranda gives everyone a chancemirandagirll on July 26th, 2012 05:08 pm (UTC)
Like idg that. How is Taylor more likable than Rob? Hasn't Taylor only had one movie outside of Twilight (not counting the little roles he did before Twilight)? Idg why they would make a list where indies old hurt your BO average. It's like they're intentionally setting their standards a certain way so certain stars get placed at certain ranks.

The only thing is I am glad for is that at least on the list, so at least he isn't a total un-wanted actor. Idk the studio score was higher than I thought it would be, so people want to put him in movies.
(no subject) - jeezbee on July 26th, 2012 05:14 pm (UTC) (Expand)
(no subject) - mirandagirll on July 26th, 2012 05:33 pm (UTC) (Expand)