?

Log in

No account? Create an account
 
 
Dec 10th
11:27 am
Early Box Office Estimates and Reviews  
I promise that the NYC post is coming soon. That is what I get for working and then going to see New Year's Eve two nights in a row (one was free or I wouldn't have gone twice, lol).

Early numbers indicated a high teens number for NYE. Variety originally reported:
Box office watchers peg the ensemble comedy's Friday take somewhere between $7 million and $8 million, which would position the Garry Marshall-helmed pic to bow in the high teens to low twenties for the weekend - slightly more modest than expectations in the low to mid twenties.

But as the evening returns came in, the Friday number sank and so did the weekend numbers. Nikki Finke on Deadline estimates (as of late last night) a $5.5 Friday and a $16 million weekend. Gitesh Pandya of Boxofficguru calls $5.1 Friday and a $14+ weekend. However that is still good enough for number one... though number one on the second (or possibly even the absolute) worst weekend of the year :/ To put it in perspective, most summer weekends this film would've been number 4 not number 1.

Obviously the film underperformed. I don't think it had a chance of doing as well as Valentine's Day which opened at a whopping $63 million but that was on Valentine's Day weekend and it was a four-day weekend to boot. But this is still massively underwhelming at half what this week's pre-release tracking estimated. Certainly WB was expecting $20 million at least (probably higher, more like the $27 million that He's Just Not That Into You managed) so they have to be sad pandas today. To me it seemed like promo really didn't kick into gear until too late... with only a couple weeks to build up interest. And maybe it was too early in the month, idk idk. But at least WB reportedly kept the budget down so overall I think it will make money but definitely not what was hoped for.

It doesn't help the reviews are dismal. On the plus side several critics have said Zac stands out, even if they are kind of bitter like Peter Travers, who after liking Zac in MAOW became pressed he's taking shitty roles. (I feel your pain Mr. Travers but keep a candle burning for the return to more interesting movies.) To be fair Travers' print review isn't quite so backhanded as his video/twitter comments - "Michelle Pfeiffer, looking dowdy (impossible!), quits her thankless secretary job to live! live! live! with the help of delivery guy Zac Efron, who delivers the film's one appealing performance." At least audiences seem to love Zac. And I didn't hear anyone at my theater say he was fat! In fact there was a lot of whistling for his first appearance on screen. One of my friends did say he hit the tanning booth too much. Though his makeup did improve after that scene. Later I may try to put some quotes together about critics on Zac for the film but paying attention to reviews is painful, lol.

My feelings on the film. It is exactly what you expect. And if you are particularly nostalgic about New Year's Eve as a holiday you will probably like it a smidge more, consequently I liked it more than Valentine's Day. I don't think critics were entirely fair. Overall is it a great film, absolutely not. Is it the worst film ever, not really. Most people can find something to enjoy and in fact I think that critics picked different storylines in the film they liked shows it does have appeal to many people which isn't a bad thing really, even if the stories are kind of shallowly dealt with. Pretty much everyone gets it right that there are just simply too many stories. It is funny to see what the critics take umbrage with when they don't have any real interest in the film. They can get stuck on the smallest things. But it is pretty bland and several plots didn't really hold up well even to a second viewing though I still liked the Zac parts and Seth Meyers and Jessica Biel were pretty funny (though oddly their story was unconnected to the other characters so maybe the most unnecessary subplot).

Anyway, as blacktreemedia said, Zac and Michelle's story could easily be its own movie. Several of her resolutions are just glossed over which is kind of disappointing. I do think Zac stands out. Partially because he is one of the few characters with energy. But he also just does well as a different kind of character than he's played before, which is nice. Most of his characters this upcoming year are very different than the ones we've seen before which is great for his development. Back to NYE - Worst moment overall: Hilary Swank's inspirational speech. Couldn't not laugh either time I saw it. Best moment overall: Zac and Michelle (but mostly Zac) dancing. Thanks Harry Shum Jr for teaching him to Dougie.

Please feel free to talk about the film in comments... try to use the spoiler code: <table bgcolor="#000000" border="0"><tr><td>YOUR TEXT GOES HERE</td></tr></table>

This results in:
YOUR TEXT GOES HERE

But everyone be aware and warned, some spoilers may still show up.

Good times:
 
 
Mood: sleepysleepy
43 43 comments Comment
 
 
lullaby_lilylullaby_lily on December 10th, 2011 07:47 pm (UTC)

I saw the Sarah Jessica Parker thing coming; it's clearly her and Josh Duhamel in the film's poster. She's the only female character with that hair type, style, and length. But I liked how the movie made it seem like he could end up with Hilary Swank or Halle Berry.

Sofia Vergara had the worst lines to read but she had a great delivery.

I watched the film in the D.C. area, so Halle Berry's "reveal" as a military spouse went over very well with the audience.

Hilary's speech - as someone who works in the PR field, I was laughing because in real life, it actually is what someone would suggest she say, and everyone would think it was a great idea, but it's really not, yet no one ever realizes that. And in real life, as she walked away, the press would be screaming, not clapping.


Is it just me... or did Zac and Michelle not have enough scenes? It seemed like every other storyline got more screen time then they did,
until the credits, which everyone in the theater seemed to think was the most enjoyable part of the film
. Maybe I feel the scenes were too few because I was watching the film just for him.
hunny miss (aka lets fead him to the gators)ehs_wildcats on December 10th, 2011 07:57 pm (UTC)
yeah i wanted them to have more scenes but i think it was because i just preferred them and their story. i think it was the most intriguing.
hunny miss (aka lets fead him to the gators)ehs_wildcats on December 10th, 2011 08:03 pm (UTC)
also i wish in this movie, as i did in valentine's day, they'd focus more on the military thing. that is one of the most heartbreaking parts of any holiday i feel like.
Miranda gives everyone a chancemirandagirll on December 10th, 2011 11:37 pm (UTC)
So you want them to focus on that aspect, yet you don't like The Lucky One? That makes no sense in my mind.
hunny miss (aka lets fead him to the gators)ehs_wildcats on December 10th, 2011 11:49 pm (UTC)
um how does wanting a focus on the military equate to automatically liking the lucky one?

i think i've said it before but i'd like the lucky one a lot more if they actually focused on the military aspect and how much of a person and family it can destroy and how little support they have. it is a little addressed problem facing the military today and the lucky one could've really shined a light on that.

instead sparks just uses the military aspect as a plot device and then shoves logan's likely inevitable PTSD (due to having seen many of his friends die while he lives) in a box after the first ten minutes of the story. logan is the one in that story who is truly fucked up, not beth. the interesting character/story isn't the focus at all because sparks sucks as a writer.
Miranda gives everyone a chancemirandagirll on December 11th, 2011 12:09 am (UTC)
I understand your point now, but I don't think it's fair to say Sparks sucks as a writer.
lullaby_lilylullaby_lily on December 11th, 2011 02:09 am (UTC)
I actually liked The Lucky One as a book -- but only because Sparks was able to create three distinct storytelling voices that broke the monotony of the actual story he was telling. Unfortunately, that's the one aspect that can't be translated to the screen.
lullaby_lilylullaby_lily on December 11th, 2011 02:24 am (UTC)
Logan's PTSD -- Sparks does mention it, but it's important to remember that the numbness and loneliness Logan felt immediately after his return is part of the character's past, not present. As important as it is to shine a light on the existence of PTSD, IMHO it's even more important to shine a light on the fact that PTSD can be managed. Servicemembers and their families who struggle with PTSD can feel it's insurmountable, when it's not. He focuses on Logan managing the most common behavior shown by those with PTSD, the difficulty they have building new relationships, and communicating with people once they are in a relationship. I think it's excellent that Logan ends up in a healthy, stable place, rather than lingering in the alcoholic stupor he once lived in.

I would also like to mention that PTSD is not "inevitable." There are those who have short-term stress reactions to war, and those who have long-term stress reactions to war. Not all veterans can be painted with the same brush.
(no subject) - ehs_wildcats on December 11th, 2011 04:02 am (UTC) (Expand)
(no subject) - lullaby_lily on December 11th, 2011 04:19 am (UTC) (Expand)
(no subject) - mirandagirll on December 11th, 2011 04:51 am (UTC) (Expand)
(no subject) - lullaby_lily on December 11th, 2011 04:58 am (UTC) (Expand)
(no subject) - mirandagirll on December 11th, 2011 05:08 am (UTC) (Expand)
(no subject) - ehs_wildcats on December 11th, 2011 05:09 pm (UTC) (Expand)
redundancy is not elaborationthelightisdim on December 10th, 2011 08:26 pm (UTC)
I don't think it is SJP and Josh on that poster. That isn't the dress she was wearing and her hair is too curly. I think it is just a random stock pic of a couple


And I felt like they were the ones with more screen time compared to the others. Maybe Hilary had a little bit more, idk.
lullaby_lilylullaby_lily on December 10th, 2011 08:31 pm (UTC)
I should have said that a different way... the couple in the picture has the most resemblance to JD and SJP's characters. At least that's feeling I had when I saw the poster and the trailer... along with disappointment, because SJP is not my idea of who JD should end up with! I've met him and he deserves better!
kleth on December 10th, 2011 10:56 pm (UTC)
Haha, I'm also a veteran of the PR wars and have to agree with you. The speech might have worked great with a waiting crowd, but the press just wants to know what's wrong and is it going to get fixed. But it's a feel-good movie, so fantasy reigns. This thing should have been produced by Hallmark, not Warner Bros.
lullaby_lilylullaby_lily on December 11th, 2011 02:30 am (UTC)
I can see this movie airing on the Lifetime channel. ;-)
Bee: Zac – Details - plaid - profilejeezbee on December 11th, 2011 12:22 am (UTC)
If you really want to know, TIME has an article with everyone's screentime. As it turns out, Lea Michele has the most.

Counting Down New Year’s Eve: Who’s in it the Most?
lullaby_lilylullaby_lily on December 11th, 2011 01:25 am (UTC)
Thanks for the link. LOL -- Zac's screen time is less than the cost of my movie ticket!
Miranda gives everyone a chancemirandagirll on December 11th, 2011 05:06 am (UTC)
Really? my movie ticket was only $7.50. You must live in a big city for it to be that expensive.