Have you noticed how many Hollywood casting choices nowadays seem to be made by gay men? How else can you explain the prominence of Zac Efron, Robert Pattinson, Shia LeBeouf, and every male in the Twilight movies? No real woman finds these guys attractive. I don’t want to witness anyone’s voice drop over the course of their silver screen “leading man” career. Real women fantasize about a man who can carry them to safety – not one who would rescue her from a poor choice of dress colour in the dressing room at the Gap.
I realise that many of these leading “men” are meant to appeal to young girls rather than mature women. That’s even more criminal. These girls really shouldn’t be developing a taste for boys their age. That’s just not normal. They’re at the age when they’re supposed to find boys repulsive. They should be spending their day at school trying to avoid “boy germs”, then on Friday night going with mom and dad to see a film featuring a real man who embodies a high standard of manhood with which they can taunt and challenge their male classmates.
It’s no wonder teenage girls are having sex with all sorts of losers in their class at an increasingly younger age. The mop-heads to which they’re exposed on the big screen – these featherweights seen to be fending off realistic looking computer generated monsters when in real life they probably couldn’t carry their mother’s groceries with their spaghetti noodle arms – serve to inflate the fantasies of young girls vis-à-vis their similar looking male classmates.
It’s called the halo effect. We political strategists use it all the time: “He talks about hope and change like Obama, ergo he’s just like Obama!” Sadly, it works – mainly on idiots and simpletons, of which there are far too many. Similarly, young girls see these estrogenized boys on the big screen and think, “This guy here in my class looks just like Shia LeBeouf, who is so brave and, like, kills aliens and saves girls and stuff! I would totally shag Shia but, youknow, he’s busy, but I have his twin here, pretty much, RIGHT IN MY CLASS! How lucky is that?!”
Habits and tastes develop in childhood. Your mother knew this, which is why she force-fed you broccoli and Brussels sprouts. The girls who lust after feminised screen idols today will eventually morph into middle age cougars with multiple divorces who can’t figure out why their men seem to enjoy spending their Saturday afternoons getting pedicures.
When I was a teenager, I lusted after Tom Cruise in Top Gun. My mother’s generation had Rock Hudson, James Dean and Marlon Brando. As this list demonstrates, it isn’t even a question of the sexual orientation of the actors themselves – but rather whether they can convincingly pull off portraying a real man. For some it may involve more acting than we realise, but that’s why they’re paid millions.
I just read a survey showing that many of these young effetes score at the top of the “talent cost” vs “bums on seats” value ratio, so using them is perhaps just a question of economics in Hollywood. Alas, manly men are in short supply and cost more. You can’t just find real, convincing leading men in the playground, or getting mom-and-son matching frosted tips at the salon.
dude, i shouldn't even call her ann coulter 2.0, she probably enjoys the comparison.
source, aka bitch plz
this is mostly a test post for ontd... i have something else to post for you guys tonight... but feel free to rage about this ridiculousity.